Sunday, December 23, 2007

PJ discusses his offense...again

Interesting stuff. Even comments on former GT commit Sean Renfree who is now looking at NU. Appears Renfree doesn't exactly fit the bill to run this offense.



For Johnson, option is only option


Terence Moore

If nothing else, you have to like new Georgia Tech football coach Paul Johnson for refusing to answer questions with an end-around. He prefers to burst up the middle, with legs still churning in search of extra yardage.

For instance: A visitor to Johnson’s office wanted to know about Sean Renfree, the nation’s 16th-best recruit at quarterback, according to Scout.com. Renfree became the first of three players to de-commit around the time previous Yellow Jackets coach Chan Gailey was fired. Before the visitor finished his question about whether Johnson’s love affair with the triple-option offense spooked the pass-oriented Renfree, Johnson began to answer.

“Don’t need him. Don’t want him. Doesn’t fit the system,” Johnson said, legs still churning, without blinking from his side of the couch across the way.

Well, then. We might as well get to the point. So are you going to use the triple-option offense at Tech as heavily as you did as the head coach at Navy for six years and at Georgia Southern for five years before that? If so, how will that affect recruiting, especially when it comes to acquiring quarterbacks and even a poor man’s version of Calvin Johnson at wide receiver?

Mostly, given the epidemic of empty seats at Bobby Dodd Stadium during most seasons (which contributed to Gailey’s ouster), will your offense that features a pass about every other presidential election attract folks or repel them?

Johnson answered each question, with legs still churning, and, yes, he will use the triple-option offense more often than not at Tech. And, no, he doesn’t think it will hinder recruiting — well, his type of recruiting that he said won’t exclude acquiring a future Calvin Johnson. And, yes, he understands that many around the Yellow Jacket Nation and beyond wonder if the triple-option offense is just another name for the boogeyman.

“They don’t understand it. What’s the first thing they think about when you say triple-option offense? Three yards and a cloud of dust,” Johnson said. “I know one year at Georgia Southern when I was there, Chattanooga led I-AA in passing. We had 25 plays of 20 yards or longer than they did, and we led the nation in rushing. I mean, you’ll see some 40-, 60-, 80-yard runs. That’s pretty exciting.

“Then, when we do throw, guys are petty wide open off of play action. At Navy, I know we were in the top 15 in passing efficiency [Actually, tied for 12th], which is the most important statistic. Not how many times you throw it.”

That’s Johnson’s story, and he’d better stick to it. His 8-4 Navy team led the nation in rushing this season, but it finished last in passing yards per game. In fact, the Midshipmen threw just an average of 10 times per game. Still, to keep Tech fans from rushing for No-Doz prior to games, Johnson suggested that Navy’s passing numbers deserve an asterisk.

There are size restrictions for those who enter the Naval Academy, which meant Johnson’s best offensive lineman was his center at 5 feet 9 and 275 pounds.

“I don’t want to be critical when I say this, because I love those kids, but there was a lot more factored in than what meets the eye as to why we did certain things,” Johnson said. “[Navy players] weren’t built for pass blocking. So it depends on the years and on the personnel. When we were at Hawaii [as offensive coordinator], it might have been 70 percent running and 30 percent passing, or even 60-40.”

The point is, said Johnson, Tech’s triple-option will evolve around the returning and incoming players that Johnson said he hasn’t had time to evaluate after barely two weeks on the job.

“I think that people have gotten too carried away with the triple-option, because that’s only one phase of the offense,” Johnson said. “If we have 75 plays, we’re not going to run 70 times. There’s a run-and-shoot package. There’s a play-action package. There’s different running plays besides the option. And, certainly, there are all kinds of options — counter option, speed option. We’ve got a sprint-out passing game. We’ve got draws. The key will be to come together with what our personnel here can do best.”

Remember, too, that Johnson’s triple-option has averaged nearly 450 yards per game to produce a 107-39 record during his time as a head coach. And here’s another thing: Hold the No-Doz.

“Everywhere I’ve coached, we’ve set attendance records,” Johnson said. “It’s an exciting offense. It’s fun to watch. You don’t know where the ball is all the time. It’s also pretty fast.”

Then Johnson eased into the biggest of smiles. That’s because his legs kept churning so much that he reached the end zone by saying, “You know what I’ve found? If you win, they like it.”

Thursday, December 20, 2007

A few thoughts on Nebraska

So wasn't bringing back Tom Osborne and hiring Bo Pelini supposed to heal the hearts and minds of Husker fans and bring everyone back together? It seems from what I read that Nebraska fans are now as divided as ever. I admit, I haven't followed the current saga going on nearly as much as I normally would have (excuse me for being less than interested in Pelini as the head coach of Nebraska). So yeah its early on. So yeah Nebraska is losing recruits (and defensive recruits) like crazy right now. And yeah, people on both sides are rationalizing whatever they want to so it gives them a "feel good" mentality. The Bo Pelini's are rationalizing decommits by saying things like:

"yeah well we didn't want these guys anyways."
"the previous staff's recruits were all overrated anyways and we're better off starting from scratch."
"Pelini evaluated the film and pulled the offer."

Well you know what? I sure hope you guys are right. Because about a month before signing day and we've lost the core of what was once a very athletic and promising group of players.

If Pelini is such a genius, why couldn't he have taken these players, kept them in the fold and coached them up into something? Wasn't that what Tom Osborne wanted?

Instead it looks like he's going to take some less highly touted players and coach them into something? Right?

I find it most ironic that 5 star Simi Kuli, who once committed to NU over LSU, is now done with Nebraska. Everyone thought he comitted to NU because he knew Pelini would be the coach here. You tell me-the only common denominator in that equation is Pelini. But Kuli sucked and Pelini didn't want him anyways. Right?

And why did Tom Osborne make such a big deal about saving this recruiting class when he was hired on as AD? Think this is really what Tom Osborne had in mind when he hired Pelini and kept Shawn Watson?

Like I said...time will tell where this ship is going. So far, it looks like a rocky start. If rumors about Barney Cotton and his recruiting prowess are true, I'm one for one so far. Because I warned against the hiring of Barney "this is the real Big Red" Cotton. Wait until Callahan's players are gone to completely judge the man.

At least if we hired Paul Johnson, we would have known we were getting a coach that could take "average" players, coach them up and put them in a position to be successful. The only thing I've seen with Pelini is he can take a group of highly regarded recruits and turn them into something average.

Trust me, I just returned on a business trip to Louisiana and talked at length with numerous LSU fans. And they all said "Thank you for taking Pelini."

But hey, people will believe whatever they want to. I'm sure I'm just full of crap and a bitter fan with an axe to grind.

By the way, has Pelini signed a contract yet??

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

To Hell with Georgia

Johnson received a standing ovation when introduced at halftime of the Yellow Jackets' basketball game against Kansas on Tuesday night.
Johnson quickly earned another ovation with his brief comments as he held a microphone at midcourt.
Johnson said he has been busy recruiting and working on building his staff at Georgia Tech in his first week on the job.
"The one thing I have learned in those seven days is to hell with Georgia!" Johnson bellowed, drawing an immediate response from the Georgia Tech fans.

--------------------------------------------
Gotta love a coach who isn't afraid to go right after his rival. Meanwhile, it looks like a complete disaster of sorts at Nebraska. Hopefully Pelini and his staff rebound and get things straightened out before signing day. One thing is for sure-its a rough start for Pelini and not just because of the recruiting. He seems to have already lost a majority of the fans that were backing his hiring just a few weeks ago.

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Updating GT

This from today's Atlanta Journal:

GIMME 5: Things to expect from Paul JohnsonIncluding beating Georgia
Published on: 12/18/07
Look out, Dawgs.
Award-winning author John Feinstein, who serves as color commentator for Navy football games, gives us five things Georgia Tech fans should expect from coach Paul Johnson:
1. Fast games. With Georgia Tech only throwing the ball slightly more often than the occurrence of leap year, people should be back at their tailgates sooner rather than later.
2. Lots of points. Johnson's offense will work anywhere, anytime, anyplace against anyone. Including the Falcons.
3. Wins over Georgia. He's good against arch-rivals: 6-0 vs. Army with an average score of 40-9.
4. A game against Georgia Southern. He still has a warm spot in his heart for the school.
5. A series against Army. OK, the Cadets just backed out of playing Tech but Johnson really likes playing against them.

Friday, December 7, 2007

So who will be right?

One thing is for sure-today's hiring by Georgia Tech of Paul Johnson now provides us with the opportunity to compare the progress between Nebraska under Bo Pelini and Georgia Tech under Johnson. Time will tell who is right and who was wrong. All the Nebraska fans that said Paul Johnson would be a terrible hire and that Pelini was the right choice will now be held accountable-as will I. Maybe that group will be right and Pelini will have Nebraska back in the BCS and competing for national titles shortly. Maybe I'll be right by saying Pelini is a poor man's Gene Chizik and be gone from Nebraska in 4 years. Or maybe the best scenario of all-Nebraska will play Georgia Tech in a bowl game within a few years and we'll be able to decide it on the field. Spring practice should be very interesting for both Nebraska and Georgia Tech. I'll be following both. But posters from HPH like OldTool and ToughTony won't be hiding from accountability any longer. Let the race begin.

Georgia Tech it is



And Paul Johnson will win immediately. In fact, he will have a great shot at winning the ACC next year. The GT schedule sets up nicely and he inherits a roster full of young and talented players. He goes from an instituation with no athletic scholarships and a few D-1 caliber players, to a school where he will now have athletes with the size, strength and physical abilities to beat the BCS teams. I'll always be a Nebraska football fan, even if I don't agree with the crooked decisions going on at my alma mater. But when Georgia Tech is in the BCS within two years, what will Nebraska fans and Tom Osborne, who completely passed on Paul Johnson, have to say? I imagine Tech QB Josh Nesbitt has to be the happiest player in the country right now.

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

This will be the player

That Johnson will build around if he takes the Georgia Tech job.



Freshman QB Josh Nesbitt

HIGH SCHOOL: The top quarterback the state of Georgia and one of the best in the nation . . . Dual-threat quarterback with tremendous athletic ability . . . Tabbed to the Scout. com national Hot 100 (No. 76) and the Rivals 250 . . . The No. 4 prospect in Georgia according to Scout.com . . . Also rated No. 14 in Georgia by Rivals . . . The No. 9 dual-threat quarterback in the nation by Rivals and the No. 12 quarterback by Scout.com . . . Two-time, first-team all-state selection and the Class AA Offensive Player of the Year as a junior . . . Named to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution Super Southern 100 and preseason Super 11 team . . . Macon Telegraph Top 50 in Georgia . . . Mobile Press-Register Super Southeast 120 . . . As a senior at Greene County High, he passed for 2,256 yards and 32 touchdowns with just four interceptions . . . Completed 134-of-222 passes . . . Also rushed for 493 yards on just 93 carries and scored eight touchdowns . . . As a junior he passed for 2,833 yards with 31 TD and nine interceptions, while rushing for 1,252 yards and 22 scores . . . Also had four inteceptions in two seasons on defense . . . Coached by Larry Milligan.
PERSONAL: Full name is Joshua Leonard Nesbitt ... Parents are David Mapp and Kean Robbins ... Born April 15, 1988 ... Majoring in management.

This and That

Paul Johnson now looks like a serious front-runner for the vacant job at Georgia Tech. The Atlanta Journal Constitution reports he will interview with GT today. The list of candidates was apparently been narrowed to three: Johnson, Georgia Southern coach Chris Hatcher and former CU coach Skippy Neuweasel. But Tony Barnhart reports its down to Johnson and GT defensive coordinator John Tenuta. If Georgia Tech does the smart thing they'll hire the man Nebraska didn't even give a chance to (and you know why-see the "Boosters for Bo" club). And if the Jackets do hire Johnson they'll contend for a NC within 3 years. The amount of talent currently on the GT roster is a night and day difference between what Johnson has to work with at Navy. And he can recruit from the entire Southeast part of the country. And finally he won't leave Georgia Tech until he retires. A+ hire for Georgia Tech if it happens.

Meanwhile, maybe Nebraska should change their name from the Nebraska Cornhuskers to the Nebraska "Hawks." If you know what I mean. After all, if Howard Hawks is going to run the football program, its only fair to honor him in name. This Buds' for you Howard.

Sunday, December 2, 2007

Paul Jonson flying to Atlanta today

To meet with his agent, Jack Reale, according to the Capital Journal Gazette. What job is he going to take??? Stay tuned.

Saturday, December 1, 2007

So my alma mater wants to silence me

Bo Pelini=horrible hire. Absolutely terrible.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Johnson to SMU? Not so fast my friend

Even though Paul Johnson does have ties to SMU AD Steve Orsini and Executive AD Mike Vaught from their days at Navy, I'm told by a very reliable source that there is absolutely no truth whatever to the rumors that Paul Johnson will be the next HC at SMU. It would literally make no sense. In fact, the job at Duke in a BCS conference (and his home state of NC) makes more sense than the job at SMU. SMU is a lateral move from Navy with a little larger pool of recruits to pick from. Put it this way-I'd be absolutely shocked if Paul Johnson ended up at SMU. He can get a better job than that. In fact, Navy might be a better job, all things considered.

Meanwhile, even a moron from the University of Colorado campus newspaper can see what needs to happen:

"If Tom Osborne of Nebraska has half a brain, he would give Navy coach Paul Johnson a serious look."

This begs the question-IF Tom Osborne doesn't even give Paul Johnson a chance, do we need to question his sanity? Johnson and Jim Grobe are very very similar in their careers and what they've done taking smaller schools to success. And all indications are, Grobe is very high on Tom Osborne's list. So what gives Tom??

The Hoodie is a big fan of PJ

From today's NY Times:

"Belichick is a big fan of Navy Coach Paul Johnson, whose run schemes Belichcik has studied in the off-season."

Yeah, Paul Johnson must just not be good enough for Nebraska (sarcasm).

Rumors are Everywhere

Rumors are everywhere that Paul Johnson is somehow, someway connected to the current head coaching opening at the University of Nebraska and that things will take shape after the Army Navy game this weekend.

Bill Wagner of the Annapolis Capital Online almost writes a eulogy saying goodbye to Johnson

The Macon Telegraph concurs that Johnson appears to have been contacted by Nebraska.

Meanwhile, Tom Osborne hints he's not done doing interviews. What are you waiting for Tom??

The Savannah Morning News, meanwhile, runs a great piece on Paul Johnson's offense and gives some more clues as to what type of coach he is.

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

This thing ain't over

Stay tuned...meanwhile-this from an article previewing the Army Navy game in the Times Herald Record. Navy senior LB Irv Spencer weights in on Coach Johnson. PJ seems like a real player's coach:

Spencer: "Every time you are around coach, you could hear one of those moments. Coach is honest-to-God, gracious in humor and a great guy to be around. His jokes are hilarious and he keeps it real loose. We have a Facebook group that keeps all the best coach (Paul) Johnson quotes."

Anyone have access to that group?

Asked the reason why Navy would win this weekend Spencer replied:

"Our scheme on offense is hard to stop. It's hard for everyone to stop. Then, we got coach Johnson. No matter how you come out defensively, he might run three or four plays and he'll change the way you block it in the middle of the game. He's the reason why we will win, coach Johnson and our coaches."

Outstanding stuff directly from a player. These are the intangibles that a head coach cannot be taught. You either have it or you don't. PJ has it.

Monday, November 26, 2007

Listen to someone that knows

Chris Landry is a New Orleans-basedFox National Sports Reporter and a owner of a consulting/search firm. Its pretty clear we're going to hire Bo Pelini. But listen real closely to what Chris Landry says about the search process. And if you want to see Landry's bio-here you go.

Landry did an interview on Big Sports 590 in Omaha today. Its quiet possibly the best insight I've ever seen into how coaching searches work; how politics and boosters get involved; and insight into Bo Pelini. Its an amazing piece that every Nebraska fan needs to listen to.

Listen here

Thursday, November 22, 2007

If LSU fans don't want Pelini...

why would Nebraska want him? Don't believe me? Go check out one of the most popular LSU message boards on the Web here and read their thoughts on Jesus Pelini and how enamored most of them are. You can even do a search for "Pelini" to find every topic in which his soft zone defenses, arrogance, poor game planning and unimaginative defenses are discussed in detail. #1 defense in the country you say? Well with the sick amount of talent in Baton Rouge, why should anyone complain? Maybe there is more than meets the eye.

Sunday, November 18, 2007

Taking apart another falsity.

I saw this comment regarding Paul Johnson on a Husker message board to which I don't subscribe and can't respond to the poster. This sums up a lot of the silliness and misinformation about Paul Johnson, his offense and his philosophy:

"Not to mention the "We don't have a playbook" comment. While he is obviously kidding, it shows that he at least has a very basic offense, one that the coaches and defensive coordinators in the Big 12 would do a better job of scheming against. A lot better coaches would be dissecting his offense. With all due respect to the great job he has done at Navy, I feel he would have to alter his offense to a spread option perhaps like the one West Virginia runs - and hiring an offensive coordinator with experience in it would be a plus.."

Let's take this statement apart little by little.

First, Paul Johnson isn't kidding when he says he doesn't have a playbook. Well sort of. But he lets his players draw up the plays in their own terms, so his playbook really doesn't end up on ebay.

Second, his offense is basic in terms of philosophy but it does take mastery-just like everything else. As one Navy player has said, they may run the same play 3,000 times a year. It means players become extremely familiar with what they're supposed to do. Contrast this to Bill Callahan's 8 lb playbook, which has confused our own players and coaches for the past 4 seasons.
The poster's statement about Big 12 defensive coordinators being better able to scheme to stop this offense is simply ridiculous. For one, it assumes that PJ's teams have played no BCS teams during his time at Georgia Southern or Navy or Hawaii. Rutgers, Notre Dame, Boston College, Oregon State, Georgia, Pittsburgh, Wake Forest, Maryland and UCONN are schools that have tried and failed to stop PJ's offense. Some may have had more success than others but remember Paul Johnson is working with an offensive line that averages about 270 lbs a man and a roster full of players that probably belong on your average D-2 school. I suggest reading the article below titled "A fascinating read," which talks about how different schools have tried to stop Johnson's offense over the years. The man is an offensive genius that has seen it all and can make in game adjustments that completely counter everything that someone throws at him. On the contrary, like Phil Fulmer said when Alabama hired Saban over PJ, Nebraska would be a nightmare for opposing defensive coordinators in this conference.

Regarding West Virginia, I would remind this poster that PJ is the sole inventor of his offense. He calls it a combination of run and shoot, spread and flexbone. He actually has borrowed from Tom Osborne's offense to create his own. And he recently spent time at West Virginia, more than likely collecting information to add to his own offense as it continues to evolve. This poster has no idea what PJ would run at Nebraska, since PJ has said repeatedly that he tailors his schemes to fit the kind of players on his roster. And if you talk to this poster, remind him that PJ's offense at Hawaii led the country in passing yardage. Now that I've done the homework, you don't have to.

The "Other" Candidates

I am continually amazed at some of the "other" coaching candidate names my fellow Husker brethren throw out-seemingly from left field. Don't get me wrong, there are some smart people out there that do their homework but some of these names just mystify me.

Turner Gill:
Not surprisingly, Gill's name pops up because of his former association with the program and his obvious affiliation with Tom Osborne. Let's be realistic people. Turner has a whole two years of head coaching experience. And yes he's done some nice things at Buffalo (despite their 4-7 record this year). And let's face it-Buffalo stinks. But Buffalo was probably not in as bad as shape as Navy was when Paul Johnson took over the program. And after Johnson went 2-10 in his first year, he's got five straight winning seasons and five straight bowl games. Hey Turner, thanks for playing but the timing just isn't right. Maybe if you can string together about 5 years of winning seasons at Buffalo and we still need a coach in 2012, we'll come looking for you. As of now, your resume compared to Johnson's is like a Pinto compared to a Porsche.

Bo Pelini:
Most of you know how I feel about the "Schnoz" bringing his gig to Lincoln. Let me ask you Bo lovers a serious question? If this man is such a hot young coaching prospect, why hasn't he gotten a head coaching job yet? We know Paul Johnson gets discriminated against because of the perception of his offense. But Bo doesn't have that problem. So why does it appear he would be about 10th on the list if Les Miles leaves for Michigan? If that's not a red flag, I don't know what is. Meanwhile, LSU fans continue to criticize him for his "soft" defensive coverages and passive schemes. His defense was torched to the tune of nearly 500 yards against a god-awful Ole Miss team yesterday. But forget all that. Being a head coach becomes much less about coaching and more about managing players and staff; making strategic decisions for the program; and being a PR guy as the face of the football team. In other words, you're a CEO. What exactly has Pelini done to make anyone think he could manage a ham sandwich, let alone the football program at the University of Nebraska? Put it this way-some guys are made to be head coaches and some guys are made to be assistant coaches/coordinators. Guess which one Pelini looks like? This is not a job to cut your teeth at and learn how to be a head coach. We need a proven winner and proven commodity and that's not Bo Pelini. And for every "Bob Stoops" reference you throw at me, I've got an Ed Oregeron to throw back. And Pelini's systems seem to thrive on getting the most talented players in the country-something that won't happen at Nebraska. The next coach at Nebraska should prove he can do less with more. And that man is Paul Johnson-not Bo Pelini.

Jim Grobe:
Yes, what Grobe has done at Wake is impressive. There's no denying that. My biggest issue with Grobe is not his ability to do the job. Its that he's 58 years old. Paul Johnson has 8 more years of coaching longevity than Grobe. Call me biased against the elderly if you want. But with all things being equal, Johnson wins on age. Not to mention that Grobe lost twice to the loser we're about to fire.

Randy Edsell:
This one confuses the heck out of me? Why does anyone want Randy Edsell at Nebraska?? Sure he's done some nice things at UCONN. But do your research and you'll find that Paul Johnson's Navy team absolutely ran circles around Edsell's Huskies last year-to the tune of about 618 rushing yards. Edsell was so thoroughly beaten that he actually (I kid you not) dropped Navy from this year's schedule. Now I don't know about you...but it looks like one coach is better than the other. And one coach made the other coach scared to play him again. Certainly we wouldn't want Paul Johnson at Nebraska now, would we? (sarcasm)
Edsell is a Syracuse alum and that's likely where he's headed. His resume can't hold a candle to Paul Johnson's.

Brian Kelly:
Brian Kelly from Cincinnati via Central Michigan via Grand Valley State is an interesting name. He's had success wherever he's been and at 45 is one of the hot young names in college football. My problem with Kelly is he's just like every other hot young coach in the country. He does the same crap and would make Nebraska just another team. With Johnson you have a unique offense that he designed that nobody else in the country can duplicate. With Kelly, we're another Missouri, Kansas, Oregon etc. Sorry, that's not what I want. I want to be different and get our identity of crushing teams to the ground again. Kelly would be a good option for a team looking to do what everyone is already is. And that's fine if you want to go that way. But on the downside-I'd like to see him sustain success at a program. Remember Dennis Franchione? He won everywhere he was and became famous for rebuilding downtrodden programs. But he left before we could see if he could keep them going. Well we know what Franchione is about now. He's about to get fired for a lousy job at Texas A&M.

Saturday, November 17, 2007

High Praise for Johnson's offense

Northern Illinois head coach Joe Novak has been around long enough, so that when he makes a statement like he did this week regarding the Navy offense, people should listen. As the coach at Northern Illinois since 1995 and the architect of a great turnaround (this season excluded), his teams have played the likes of Kansas State (late 90s), Penn State, Auburn, Northwestern, Maryland and Michigan. Novak on Paul Johnson's offense:

"Nobody, and I mean nobody, stops them from running the football. They are as good on offense as any team I've ever seen."

"It is the best offense we have faced by far," said Northern coach Joe Novak. "This is the kind of offense that runs you out of coaching when you are trying to defend it, it's that good."

Can I get a "Yo?"

Friday, November 9, 2007

A genius calling the plays

Unfortunately, I can't take credit for this. It was done by a Notre Dame poster on NDnation.com-this shows the pure genius of Paul Johnson's playcalling, which appears to be very similar to a pretty good former coach at Nebraska (hint not Frank Solich):

By my count, Navy ran a total of 10 different plays. They used 3 different formations to run these plays, and they had 3 different blocking schemes. That is it. And when your offense is that condensed, not only can the players practice the execution of the plays to perfection, but the coach already knows what adjustments he is going to make based on how the defense reacts. Charlie Weis could learn a lot about condensing his offense from this experience.

By the way, the 10 plays were:
1. Triple Option
2. Toss Sweep
3. FB Blast (which is the Delaware Wing T play)
4. QB designed keep behind the lead FB
5. HB option pass
6. Play action pass from Triple Option look
7. FB waggle pass
8. 1 yard hitch quick pass
9. Reverse Pivot - Split Option....the FB option is to one side but the QB and HB option are back to the other side
10. Double Option - blocking all players

The sequencing of plays used by Navy was incredibly well thought out to mess with the heads of our defense.

Opening Drive:

1. 1 yard quick hitch pass. ND is geared up for the option but the CB were playing off the WR, so Navy took the easy catch for a 14 yard gain.
2. Triple Option - Blocking Scheme 1 (lineman block down inside). ND has practiced and stop the play easily.
3. Toss Sweep - Blocking Scheme 2 (the lineman loop around the outside of the DE and OLB).

The play works but ND causes a fumble.

Drive 2:
1. Triple Option - Blocking Scheme 2 - So now Johnson is mixing together the 2nd play call with the 3rd play's blocking scheme to mess with the defense. Johnson likes this scheme and sticks with it for much of the first half. The key is that Navy is able to block the NT with just the Center. No double team is required in the middle of the field which frees up the Guard to loop around and block the LB flowing to the play. The Notre Dame DE and OLB are standing very close together and pretty much just standing still. Navy's QB is not getting hit hard. The defense is not committing to any particular option consistently so Navy has a nice mix of FB, QB and HB carries on the option plays.

Also of note, normally the option gets run to the wide side of the field unless the defense commits an extra player to one side. Paul Johnson was faithful to this "field" side convention but added a wrinkle on Navy's first touchdown. Navy had a first and goal from the 5 yard line. Navy ran the Reverse Pivot - Split option. The FB dive option went to the boundary side and the QB reversed direction and ran the rest of the option to the field. This was the first time Navy used that look in the game and it allowed the slower Navy HB to outrun the faster Notre Dame CB to the corner of the end zone. Just a half second delay that gets induced by getting the defense to flow one way and then coming back the other way. The timing of when that half second could be used to the maximum effect was brilliant play calling by Paul Johnson.

Drive 3: New wrinkle. Navy lines up in a new formation. The WRs are tucked in very close to the OT's in the formation. The WBs are a little deeper in the backfield behind the WRs. Navy runs the reverse pivot - split option again, but with a new blocking scheme on this drive. This time the OT blocks the DE. This is the first time the DE has been blocked all game long, now deep into the 2nd quarter. The WR runs deep taking the CB with him. The far side OG pulls and loops around and blocks the MLB...a rather long run but he makes his block perfectly. The OLB is left unblocked for the option. The FB fake is to the right, the QB and WB reverse and come back to the left. 12 yard gain even though the pitch man read his block wrong and went outside when he should have cut in. The very next play, from the same formation, Navy fakes the toss sweep to the right and give to the FB also to the right. Something looks weird. I watch the play 4 times in slow motion before I see it. There it is. This was just a regular running play. Everybody was blocked by the man in front of them. So on two consecutive plays, Paul Johnson runs at a DE while blocking him for the first time all game long. The DE is so used to standing up and watching the play as nobody touches him. Now he gets effectively blocked straight up by a Navy lineman who weighs 50lbs less than him, all because of a well timed use of the play. Next play, same look, Triple option boundary side. Next play, same look, fake triple option, drop back pass - dropped in the end zone by the WR. ND actually had this play covered fairly well which is surprising. The drive ends in a touchdown to make it 14-14.

---------------------------------
2nd Half 1st Play: Triple option, give to the FB. For once, the MLB comes up strong to meet this play at the line of scrimmage. This is a good correction by Corwin Brown at halftime, but really, this should have been the plan all along.

2nd Play. FB Blast. No option, just a regular running play. The Navy OG crushes Trevor Laws who is nearly twice his size. Again Laws is used to standing up and watching as nobody blocks him. On this play the Guard takes two steps forward like he is blocking down on the LB like he normally does, and then he makes a right turn and basically trap blocks Laws. Again, the blocking scheme is very clever when put into the contect of what has been happening all game long.

3rd play: Toss Sweep

4th Play: Triple Option

5th Play: QB keeps and follows the FB into the dive hole. This was not an option but a designed play. The OT uses a kick out block on the OLB, the first time the OLB has been blocked all game long, and the WB blocks down on the DE, the first time he has been blocked from this angle all game long. Just a simple cross blocking scheme but it is so effective since those players have been so used to not getting blocked and they had not yet been blocked by those players from those angles before.

6th play: FB Blast - everyone blocked

7th play: Triple Option - give to FB 8th play: 4th and 2 Navy gives a weird look. WB motions into backfield like an I formation and stops...normally on the option this is fluid and the ball is snapped while he is moving. Then the other WB motions into the backfield and stops forming a true wishbone. Navy is just trying to draw ND offside with a weird look. ND doesn't fall for it and Navy calls timeout.

9th play: 4th and 2. Fake the reverse pivot triple option and the QB keeps the ball. Everyone was blocked. The Guard kicks out the DE. The Tackle kicks out the OLB and the WB loops inside and lead blocks on the isolated MLB. This is the first look at this blocking scheme so far for the defense.

10th play: Triple option to the boundary instead of the field side for a change of pace.

11th play: FB Blast. #74 of Navy destroys Trevor Laws again.

12th play: Toss Sweep. Should have been called for a block in the back but Navy got away with it. Notre Dame defense has not blown up a single play all game.

13th play: 3rd and 1 from the 5. New look. Navy goes unbalanced line with a 3rd lineman covering the Tackle on the field side. The defense doesn't respond quite right but the safety sort of cheats over a bit to the formation. FB Blast look but the QB keeps and follows the FB through the hole.

14th play: 1st and goal from the 4. FB Blast. Navy uses the Guard and Tackle to double team the DE. This is the first double team of the game on a player that has been left unblocked most of the time. Dwight Stephenson is just destroyed and plowed back into the end zone ending up on his back. Navy gets to the 1 inch line.

15th play: FB Blast - for a Touchdown. Navy misses the kick and it is 21-20.

----------------------- 2nd drive of 2nd Half
1st Play: FB Blast - holding penalty making it 1st and 20

2nd Play: 1 yard hitch pass - minimal gain

3rd play: Triple Option Play Action - deep pass. Pass Interference leads to a 1st down.

4th play: FB Blast

5th play: Triple Option- FB give. This is the first option play in the last 10 plays. Paul Johnson doesn't even have to risk putting the ball on the ground now. He has outsmarted our defensive line so thoroughly that Navy is beating Notre Dame using straight up Wing T plays from 1950.

6th play: 3rd and 5: FB waggle pass for a 1st down. Great design. The WR runs a seam route. The WB motions to the other side of the field. They give the reverse pivot - split option look but the FB flares out into the empty flat.

7th play: Toss Sweep

9th Play: FB Blast

10th Play: FB Blast

11th play: 2nd and 9. Triple Option - give to the FB. For the first time all game long, the NT beats the single block from the Center and stuffs this play. The NT play has been unacceptable making it too easy for Navy.

12th play: 3rd and 8. Triple option but with no motion by the WB this time for a new look. The give is to the FB which was a poor choice on 3rd and 8. This may be the first bad read Enhada has made all game long. FG attempt misses but on the ensuing drive Navy sacks Sharpley and returns the fumble for a TD. 2pt conversion play is interesting. Navy lines up trips right. They pull a Guard away from the formation to kick out the OLB and run a double option with the FB as the pitch man. But the players are blocked at the point of attack. This looks like the Lou Holtz option. -----------------------------------------

1st Overtime FB Waggle Triple Option - Pitch FB Blast FB blast - for a Touchdown.

2nd Overtime Triple Option - QB keep Triple option - QB keep Then a very interesting series of events. On the previous play, the CB crashed the pitch man very hard. This was only the second or third time all game that Walls played the option this way. On the very next play, Navy changed up the blocking scheme. They came triple option but had the Guard kick out the OLB and had the WB loop inside of this block and lead up through the hole. The QB kept the ball and ran up inside of the kicked out OLB. So as soon as ND decided to be aggressive on the perimeter, Paul Johnson simply changed the perimeter and ran the option in between the DE and the OLB. So for those who thought that Brown should have the defense be more aggressive, Paul Johnson already thought about that and had his answer ready. On the next play, the Triple Option - pitch was stopped for a loss. For the first time all game long, the DE prevented the OT from getting off the line of scrimmage cleanly and it screwed the whole play up. This is what I said I wanted our DE to do in mid week. Don't let Navy leave you unblocked and get their blocks on other players. Intercept them and disrupt the play. HB option pass almost intercepted. FG is made

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

Maximizing the talent

The Chicago Sun Times weighs in on how a team of "Rudys" took down mighty Notre Dame. Once again, Paul Johnson does more with less than ANYONE in the country. Maybe in the history of college football.

And you wonder why Navy's defense has ranked so bad this year??

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How about Navy, people?

The service academy's dedication to pressing matters such as steering battleships and maintaining nuclear submarines makes football something it can embrace only as a ferocious after-school passion undertaken by the few, the proud, the rejected.

Why, Navy's adrenaline-fueled, David-slaying-Goliath, heart-pounding goal-line stand at the end of that triple-overtime battle made ''Rudy'' look like a frat-house vanity film.

Navy didn't have a Rudy -- it was infested with Rudys.

''We had only two defensive starters coming back this season,'' Navy associate athletic director Scott Strasemeier said, ''and we lost them both on the first series of the second game. We've started 23 guys on defense so far, a school record.''

More than that, Navy already has started 11 players in its secondary.

Against Notre Dame, 18-year-old, 175-pound freshman Kevin Edwards started for the Middies at cornerback, his first start.

Fellow teenage freshman Wyatt Middleton, whose sister graduated from Notre Dame, started at safety and led the team with 14 tackles.

''The vast majority of our players had no other Division I offers,'' Strasemeier said. ''They came here because nobody else wanted them. And to a man, they came here because they wanted to play Notre Dame.''

Even if it meant getting steamrolled for, say, years 64, 65, 66 ad nauseam.

Navy had guys on the field Saturday you wouldn't notice in real life unless they had birdbaths on their heads.

Navy peerless

The Middies' two starting running backs, Zerbin Singleton and Reggie Campbell, go 5-8, 174 and 5-6, 168.

When team captain Campbell came out for the coin toss, standing next to the Notre Dame giants, one wanted to rush out and yell, ''This kid's lost. Where's his mommy?''

There was even a Navy player -- walk-on reserve defensive end Steve Dorman, from a small town in Washington -- who got into the game and thus played in his first football contest, at any level, any age, down to birth.

Everywhere you looked on the Navy side, there were young men whose hearts were twice the size of their uniforms.

Navy's quarterback, 5-11, 194-pound Kaipo-Noa Kaheaku-Enhada (''We just call him Kaipo,'' the SID said) might not even be your first pick in a flag football league.

But Kaipo completed some of the sweetest, most pressure-packed passes you'll ever see.

Navy's ''D'' had gotten five sacks all year, and then they sacked Notre Dame's Evan Sharpley four times.

One of those sacks was created by perhaps the most ridiculous, improper, joyous play of this or any season: Navy's outside linebacker Ramiro Vela launching himself like Batman over Irish blocker Armando Allen and swan-diving into Sharpley.

''The linebacker, 34, I forget his name off the top of my head, launches over Armando's head,'' Weis said afterward, not too happily.

They call him Ram, Coach, or as he's now known in Annapolis, ''Super Ram,'' and he's a mighty kid from San Antonio who goes a superhuman 5-9, 196.

A D-I linebacker, folks.

Maybe you even want to include Navy no-name coach Paul Johnson in the hero mix.

After Notre Dame had curiously been given a second chance at a two-point conversion to tie the game in the third overtime, Johnson told his players to blitz.

All 11 of them.

Some players were quizzical.

''Just sell out!'' Johnson said. ''They're gonna run it. If they pass, it's on me.''

Notre Dame did run it. The Middies did blitz.

And if you don't think this was a game that made the angels sing, you got no religion at all.

ND gets 'Rudy' awakening

Tuesday, November 6, 2007

A fascinating read

This article is from Irish Sports Report during Johnson's 1st year at Navy. Incredible insight into the amazing Paul Johnson:

Can Johnson get Navy beyond that sinking feeling?ND VS. NAVYBy BILL WAGNERSpecial To ISR
Navy coach Paul Johnson has installed a powerful offense, but the Middies’ defense continues to struggle.
Photo Courtesy of the U.S. Naval Academy
He has been dubbed an offensive genius. He has been likened to Steve Spurrier.
Not bad for a good old boy who would have been quite happy coaching high school football in his hometown.
Paul Johnson's innovative spread offense has piled up points, yardage and victories at every stop of his 20-year coaching career. Now the 45-year-old native of Newland, N.C., is hoping his patented triple-option attack can help turn around a Naval Academy program that has hit rock bottom.
Early returns have been mixed.
As advertised, the spread has produced prolific numbers, however not nearly enough to overcome a woeful defense that ranks among the nation's worst.
Navy, 1-7 entering its annual mismatch with Notre Dame, has been assured of its fifth straight losing season. The Midshipmen are 2-27 the past three seasons as a result of numerous problems that extend beyond the football field.
Johnson, who compiled a stellar 62-10 record and captured a pair of Div. I-AA national championships during a five-year stint at Georgia Southern, has pushed the academy administration to better support the program.
So far, the response has been favorable.
Navy recently revealed that it will alter the mandatory five-year military obligation for graduates who are professional sports prospects. Football players who make an NFL roster can serve two years on active duty and six years in the reserves.
Members of the Navy brass are also considering giving football players who suffer season-ending injuries an extra year to graduate. Service academy rival Air Force has been taking advantage of NCAA-issued medical redshirts for years, but Navy has frowned upon the practice.
Finally, Johnson and athletic director Chet Gladchuk have discussed downgrading Navy's schedule to include more beatable opponents. Div. I-AA schools, which former head coach Charlie Weatherbie refused to play, have been reinstated to future schedules.
For instance, a scheduled game at Washington next season has been replaced by a home contest against Virginia Military Institute. Gladchuk has stated emphatically that Navy will never drop Notre Dame.
"I can understand playing Notre Dame every year. That game has a lot of history and meaning," Johnson said recently. "But you don't need to play Boston College and N.C. State on top of it. How are you going to have a successful season when you schedule yourself six losses before you start? It's all right to play Notre Dame. I think that's a great rivalry. But be smart. In between, play Buffalo and somebody from Div. I-AA."
Johnson feels there's a bit of the old chicken-and-egg theory at work. In order to start winning, Navy needs to recruit better talent. But the key to getting good players is winning.
For now, reality is that Navy may not have a single player on its current roster who received a scholarship offer from another Div. I-A program.
"You can't recruit against Georgetown and play against Notre Dame," Johnson told the Washington Post.
What's amazing is that Johnson has his offensive engine humming, despite subpar parts. Navy is averaging 22.8 points and 446 yards per game, despite not starting a single skill position player who runs the 40-yard dash in under 4.6 seconds. The Midshipmen rank third nationally in rushing offense, grinding out 282 yards per game.
Quarterback Craig Candeto (team-highs of 622 yards rushing, nine touchdowns) has been the catalyst. Fullback Kyle Eckel (448 yards rushing, four TDs) and slot back Eric Roberts (696 total yards, five TDs) are the other primary weapons.
Opposing coaches have been effusive in their praise of Navy's unique attack, which produced season-highs of 678 total yards and 40 points against Northwestern.
"Navy has moved the ball on every team it's played, including N.C. State," Duke coach Carl Franks marveled. "Paul has put together a very dangerous offense that is extremely challenging to face. I don't think you can completely stop that offense, you just have to try and slow it down."
Tulane coach Chris Scelfo said the triple-option element forces defenses to be assignment-oriented. Defenders who aren't disciplined get caught out of position, and that leads to big plays.
"I think every team that plays Navy is worried about that spread. It's something you don't see very often, and they execute it so well," Scelfo said. "Paul Johnson is kind of the guru of option football these days. He's running that style of offense better than any other coach in the country."
Some have compared Johnson to Spurrier, the former Florida and current Washington Redskins head coach. Both are the architects of high-powered offenses only they truly understand. Other teams might line up the same way, but none are running the spread to the level of Johnson.
"This is Paul's offense. He designed it, he tweaked it, he knows it inside and out," said Navy assistant Ken Niumatalolo, who played for Johnson at Hawaii and has assisted him on three different occasions. "Just like Spurrier invented the Fun-and-Gun, Paul invented this version of the spread. Nobody runs it the way he does."
On the surface, the spread seems simple. It's based on triple-option principles and features one setback, two slotbacks offset from the line of scrimmage and two wide receivers. There is no tight end, although one of the wideouts will often move inside and line up in a three-point stance.
What's different and confusing to defenses is the myriad of plays Johnson has created out of the basic formation. He'll run the fullback on dives, traps, draws and tosses. He'll utilize the slotbacks on sweeps, reverses, option pitches and play-action passes.
If opponents aren't respecting the quarterback, Johnson will call for plays designed to gain yardage on keepers. If opponents stack the line of scrimmage to stop the run, Johnson will throw.
"This offense is a combination of things I've picked up over the years. It's a little bit of Wisbhone, a little bit of I-formation, a little bit of Veer, a little bit of Run-and-Shoot," Johnson explained. "I've grabbed and took bits and pieces from different sets and gradually evolved it into what we're doing today."
While the average fan focuses on formations and plays, the most important element of the spread involves blocking schemes. Johnson's system is based largely on misdirection and running plays to an area where there are more blockers than defenders.
"The whole point is that you don't have to block everybody. It's about angles and gaining a numbers advantage," he said.
Yet Johnson's true genius lies in play-calling. He has an uncanny knack for figuring out what the opponent is doing to defend the spread, then adjusting the gameplan accordingly.
"Not many guys know how to make split-second decisions about what plays will work based on what's happening on the field," Niumatalolo said. "Paul is one of the few coaches who can call a game by the seat of his pants."
After 20 years of running the spread, Johnson has seen every imaginable defense designed to stop it. In the season opener against SMU, Johnson went to a stack alignment that overloaded one side of the line with blockers. The Mustangs never figured it out and were toasted to the tune of 38 points and 399 yards.
"I think if you're going to do something, you better know how to fix it when it breaks," Johnson said. "If our offense isn't working for one reason or another, I usually have a pretty good idea why and know how to get it going again."
Johnson's spread has put up record-setting numbers at Lees McCrae junior college, Georgia Southern (twice), Hawaii and now Navy for the second time. He was offensive coordinator in 1996 when the Midshipmen set numerous school records en route to a 9-3 record that included a victory over California in the Aloha Bowl.
Interestingly, Johnson had no intention of criss-crossing the country as a collegiate assistant. His goal after graduating from Western Carolina in 1979 was to become head coach at Avery County High, his alma mater.
Johnson did indeed return to Avery County and served as an assistant to longtime head coach Elmer Aldridge.
"I figured I'd wait for coach Aldridge to retire and then, if I was lucky, I could be the head coach for 15 or 20 years," he said.
This Saturday, at Ravens Stadium in Baltimore, Johnson will probably think about how far he's come since those days as a high school assistant. A head coach at the Div. I-A level for the first time in his career, Johnson will be attempting to upset the most storied program in college football. And he'll be using a style of offense that Notre Dame fans found distasteful toward the end of the Bob Davie Era.
Want evidence that Johnson has become the leading authority on triple-option offense? It comes from sources who report that former Notre Dame head coach Davie once contacted Johnson about serving as the team's offensive coordinator.
Johnson would neither confirm nor deny that, saying only that Notre Dame officials contacted him once while he was head coach at Georgia Southern.

Monday, November 5, 2007

See a pattern here?

ESPN's Mark Schlabach weighs in on Navy's historical win over Notre Dame:

But Notre Dame's struggles don't diminish Navy's accomplishment. No matter how poorly the Irish are playing in coach Charlie Weis' third season, Notre Dame should always be favored against the Midshipmen.
Despite its recent struggles, Notre Dame still has the pick of the litter more times than not in recruiting. Conversely, the Midshipmen must find players who are academically fit to attend the U.S. Naval Academy and who also are willing to make a military commitment at a time when the country is at war.
"I don't think people fully realize the obstacles you face at the academies," Johnson said.
The Fighting Irish are supposed to be bigger, faster and stronger than the Midshipmen. Each of Notre Dame's five starting offensive linemen weighs more than 300 pounds. Navy doesn't have a 300-pounder starting on offense or defense. In fact, Irish offensive tackle Sam Young, a 6-foot-8, 310-pound sophomore, often blocked end Michael Walsh, a 239-pound junior.
"Notre Dame has struggled to win games, but they still have great athletes, and everybody still wants to go to Notre Dame if they have the opportunity," Navy quarterback Kaipo-Noa Kaheaku-Enhada said. "You have to respect them. They still have that great tradition and history."
By the time the Midshipmen returned to the U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis, Md., late Saturday night, they were greeted by most of the brigade for a celebration at Tecumseh Court. Capt. Margaret D. Klein, the academy commandant, canceled Monday's classes to honor the win.
"It was crazy," Kaheaku-Enhada said. "I got off the bus and was mobbed."
Johnson said beating Notre Dame is one of his program's biggest achievements, regardless of how the Fighting Irish finish the season. The Irish finished 2-7 in 1963, the last time Navy beat them.
"What was Notre Dame's record in 1963?" Johnson asked. "It wasn't very good, but nobody ever prefaces the articles with that record, do they? Any time Navy beats Notre Dame, it's a big deal. Anybody who watched the game could tell it's a big deal. Anybody that doesn't think Notre Dame has good players, they can come watch the film with me. They've got some really good players. I'll bet a lot of their players end up playing in the NFL."

Sunday, November 4, 2007

Tony Barnhart says its time

Tony Barnhart of the Atlanta Journal Constitution is one of the most well respected college football writers/analysts in the country. He says its time for big schools to start looking at PJ:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Think it's about time one of these schools looking for a coach took a glance at Navy's Paul Johnson? Johnson, a former Bobby Dodd National Coach of the Year, was expected to struggle this year with a very young defense. But Saturday the Midshipmen (5-4) beat Notre Dame 46-44 in triple overtime, snapping their 43-game losing streak to the Fighting Irish.

"Our schedule was kind of front-loaded with tough teams and we had a young defense that got banged up, so we struggled," Johnson said Sunday. "But we've got three games left (North Texas, Northern Illinois, Army) and if we can win them we'll be 8-4 and that's not too bad."

Johnson is the first Navy coach since 1963 to beat Notre Dame. Not too bad.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My own opinion-he won't be at Navy next year and whoever takes a chance is going to get themselves a helluva head coach.

A Landmark Victory

Navy's thrilling triple OT victory over Notre Dame yesterday in South Bend, on national television in front of 80,000 fans, was a landmark win for the Navy program and for Head Coach Paul Johnson. I'm sure some will throw out the "well Notre Dame is terrible" line. But as Gregg Doyle from CBS Sports says:

"Navy should never, and I mean ever, beat Notre Dame.
Navy isn't as good as it has been under sixth-year head coach Paul Johnson, but Johnson has an excuse. He's been trying to recruit players to the Naval Academy with the country at war. Playing football for Navy today means fighting in a war tomorrow. Playing football for Navy is literally a matter of life and death."

And Doyle continues:

"an appreciation of Navy, which plays a remarkable brand of football despite its inherent disadvantages in college football's highest classification."

And Mike Hutton from the Gary (Indiana) Post Tribune says:

"There are no other options for a team full of undersized guys who shouldn't come within a couple of touchdowns of beating Notre Dame on paper. Ever. Not in 43 years or 143 years."

The bottom line in this victory for Navy...Paul Johnson probably elevated his stock tremendously in the eyes of quite a few BCS schools that will be looking for a new coach this offseason. He took a group of players that had no business being on the same field as Notre Dame and ended the longest lopsided streak in college football. I hope Tom Osborne was watching.

Thursday, November 1, 2007

So does this all matter?

So does having a blog to support the hiring of Paul Johnson as the next NU coach, really make a difference in the grand scheme of things? Maybe. Maybe not. My single goal though is to generate a grassroots effort to get people talking about Paul Johnson. Maybe when they do...Tom Osborne and some others will start paying attention. My blog was discussed yesterday on Omaha's Big Sports 590 with Matt Perrault. Maybe its coincidence but at least Johnson is being talked about by the Omaha World Herald as one of the main candidates for the soon to be open coaching job at the University of Nebraska. Hey...someone make sure Tom Osborne gets emailed a link to this site.

Reciple for success

From this morning's Capital Online:

The Midshipmen are seeking to become the first team in NCAA history to lead the nation in rushing three seasons in a row and have committed the fourth-fewest penalties among 119 Football Bowl Subdivision schools.

Sunday, October 28, 2007

Paul Johnson and the "option."

"We CAN'T hire Paul Johnson-he runs the option and the option doesn't work in college football anymore!"

I can't believe how many uninformed dolts there are when it comes to understanding who Paul Johnson is and what his offense is about. I create a blog devoted to informing people about Paul Johnson and his offense and people just continue to believe whatever they want to. Or continue to make up bizarre tales so they can say "We need Bo because Bo...is a tough guy....and won't run the option." Let's try to clear up a few misconceptions here:

1.) The option is alive and well in college football. Florida, West Virginia, Wake Forest and a myriad of other teams all run some form of the option. Now its not the option that you think of when you think of days gone by but its still an option and is disguised very well. Barry Switzer has been quoted recently as saying if he were to get back into coaching he would run Osborne's offense. But hey, who is Barry Switzer, right? Hell, Texas A&M came in and ran the option right up our asses a week ago. And Tom Osborne appears to be infatuated with what Urban Meyer does at Florida. So you people need to shut your cake holes when it comes to saying the option doesn't exist in college football or wouldn't work anymore.

2.) Paul Johnson has compared his Navy offensive scheme to what Urban Meyer and Rich Rodriguez do at their respective schools, except that they run their QB out of the shotgun. Mike Leach has said what Johnson does is essentially the same that Tech does except Navy runs the ball and TT throws the ball.

3.) Now pay attention very closely to this point. WHO says Paul Johnson would run the same exactly flexbone system he runs at Navy, at a school like say, Nebraska?? Who says that? Where does this come from?? Do you people realize that he does what he does at Navy because of the type of players he has? Doesn't that seem logical for a good head coach to do? Adapt your schemes to the type of players you have. Check his work as OC at Hawaii-he threw the ball all over because he had a QB that could throw. Ya know what though? If he did run his spread option flexbone at NU, I wouldn't be complaining. Its tailor-made to the type of talent he could easily stockpile around here and that talent is still 10x better than what he can get at Navy. And if his current system can rush for 350 yards on Wake Forest and Navy, and 250 on Rutgers, who is to assume with better talent, he couldn't do the same against Kansas, Missouri and even Texas? As Jim Grobe from Wake says:

"You just don't see anybody doing that anymore, so (Navy is) very unique … and they do it better than anyone we've ever seen," Grobe said. "Knowing things you'd like to do to stop the option is one thing. But being able to prepare for it in a week, getting the scout team to perform at the same speed of a game, is quite another.

"There are so many problems that go into preparing for this offense that knowing what to do doesn't always do much for you. You've got to be able to practice it, and nobody can do a very good job of that."

The people that do research...

Actually understand what Navy football and Paul Johnson are about and anticipated what would happen this year:

From a May 14th, 2007 article titled "Can't wait to see these things in the fall" by ESPN college football analysts Ivan Maisel and Mark Schlabach:

From Schlabach:

This is the year to catch Navy, where coach Paul Johnson must rebuild his defense and his offensive line. But with Kaipo-Noa Kaheaku-Enhada established at quarterback, and Army and Air Force dealing with new coaches, the Midshipmen should win their fifth consecutive Commander-In-Chief's Trophy. After all, if a wizened head like Bobby Ross couldn't turn it around at Army, what can be said for his replacement, former NFL stalwart Stan Brock?

From Maisel:
Can Paul Johnson do it again at Navy? The Midshipmen must replace nine starters on defense and a few regulars on the offensive line. But with quarterback Kaipo-Noa Kaheaku-Enhada and a handful of talented slotbacks returning, there is no reason to believe the Midshipmen can't win at least six games, which would earn them another trip to the Dec. 20 San Diego Credit Union Poinsettia Bowl. If that happens, will the rest of college football recognize that Johnson is truly one of the best coaches in the land?

-----------------------------

So you see, not only did Navy have to replace nine starters on defense, its three best and most experienced defensive players (and team captain Jeff Deliz) are standing on the sidelines injured. Despite the defensive issues, Navy is still on track to win 7 games, win the commander in chief trophy again and exceed expectations yet again.

Johnson at GA Southern

Looks like some pretty good defenses to me.



1997

8/30/1997




Valdosta State




45-26
9/6/1997William & Mary 28-29
9/20/1997Wofford 22-7
9/27/1997Chattanooga 37-10
10/4/1997VMI 49-0
10/11/1997Western Carolina 30-7
10/18/1997Appalachian State 12-24
10/25/1997The Citadel 49-7
11/1/1997East Tennessee 38-30
11/8/1997Furman 30-13
11/15/1997South Florida 24-23
11/29/1997Florida A&M 52-37
12/6/1997Delaware 7-16

1998
9/5/1998Elon 31-17
9/12/1998Jacksonville State 51-32
9/19/1998Wofford 45-10
9/25/1998Chattanooga 42-25
10/3/1998VMI 63-7
10/10/1998Western Carolina 28-21
10/17/1998Appalachian State 37-24
10/24/1998The Citadel 51-34
10/31/1998East Tennessee 47-26
11/7/1998Furman 45-17
11/14/1998South Florida 28-23
11/28/1998Colgate 49-28
12/5/1998Connecticut 52-30
12/12/1998Western Illinois 42-14
12/19/1998Massachusetts 43-55

1999
9/4/1999Fayetteville State 76-0
9/11/1999Wofford 55-14
9/18/1999Oregon State 41-48
9/25/1999Chattanooga 49-10
10/2/1999VMI 62-0
10/9/1999Western Carolina 70-7
10/16/1999Appalachian State 16-17
10/23/1999The Citadel 34-17
10/30/1999East Tennessee 55-6
11/6/1999Furman 41-38
11/13/1999Jacksonville State 51-14
11/27/1999Northern Arizona 72-29
12/4/1999Massachusetts 38-21
12/11/1999Illinois State 28-17
12/18/1999Youngstown State 59-24


2000
9/2/2000Georgia 7-29
9/9/2000Johnson C. Smith 57-12
9/16/2000Wofford 24-17
9/23/2000Chattanooga 31-10
9/30/2000VMI 56-3
10/7/2000Western Carolina 42-24
10/14/2000Appalachian State 34-28
10/21/2000The Citadel 27-10
10/28/2000East Tennessee 42-7
11/4/2000Furman 10-45
11/11/2000Elon 32-9
11/25/2000McNeese State 42-17
12/2/2000Hofstra 48-20
12/9/2000Delaware 27-18
12/16/2000Montana 27-25

2001
9/1/2001Savannah State 69-6
9/8/2001Delaware 38-7
9/22/2001Chattanooga 70-7
9/29/2001VMI 31-14
10/6/2001Western Carolina 50-14
10/13/2001Appalachian State 27-18
10/20/2001The Citadel 14-6
10/27/2001East Tennessee 16-19
11/3/2001Furman 20-10
11/10/2001Elon 27-21
11/24/2001Wofford 48-10
12/1/2001Florida A&M 60-35
12/8/2001Appalachian State 38-24
12/15/2001Furman 17-24

Navy lost. So what? (part 2)

As a followup to my post below and a certain anonymous poster that ridiculously says in Johnson's 6th season, Navy should be established and not rebuilding. Well son, I guess you don't spend too much time around the Navy football offices to see what kind of players the Naval academy can actually get to compete for them. So lets look at some other established and high profile coaches that aren't struggling for talent and cherrypick some notable losses:

-Greg Schiano from Rutgers inherited a better team than Johnson did at Navy (go back and look and you'll see in 2001 when Schiano arrived his team beat Navy). So if Greg Schiano is such a hot coach, why is his team losing to 1st year Cincinnati coach Brian Kelly in his 7th season at Rutgers? That same Cincinnati team that lost to Pitt, which lost to Navy a week earlier. Why is Schiano losing 30-3 and looking hapless against West Virginia? Shouldn't his team be putting up more of a fight 7 years into his coaching tenure? Why in his 6th year is his team getting 33 hung up on them by a 2-9 Illinois team?

-Why is the once invincible Jim Leavitt from South Florida now skidding out of control with two straight losses to Rutgers and UConn? Those appear to be good, but not great teams with similar talent levels. Shouldn't the mighty Leavitt, who has been at South Florida since 1995, be winning against these programs? Wouldn't it be easier to look at the entire body of work of each of Leavitt and Schiano, along with Paul Johnson?

-In Bob Stoops sixth season, he lost 45-12 to a Texas team with no more talent than his own. And in his seventh season last year, he lost to Boise State and their first year coach Chris Peterson-and Boise State doesn't have a player on their roster that could crack the two deeps at OU.

-And what about Bo Pelini. His defense gives up more yards and points to Kentucky in a loss, than lowly Mississippi State did when they beat Kentucky yesterday. Maybe just a bad game for Jesus H. Pelini?

-And what in holy hell is Pete Carroll doing at USC?? Every player on his two-deeps will eventually play in the NFL and the team he's manned for 8 years is losing to Stanford?? Fire him now!

So what's it all mean Einstein? It means that you need to look at the entire body of work for a coach over the course of his tenure/career and put wins and losses into context. Trying to cherrypick a loss or even a season for negatives, without looking closer at the details, just means you're pushing an agenda.

PJ will not be brought here to run the defense. He will hire the best possible DC he can get at the University of Nebraska. He will be brought here for his leadership, proven head coaching ability and offensive wizardry. And if you have questions about what he's done over the entire course of his career at Ga Southern and Navy, please feel free to read this entire blog from top to bottom. There's a ceiling to what can be done at the US Naval Academy. And PJ reached that ceiling about two years ago when his team won 10 games.

Saturday, October 27, 2007

Navy lost. So what?

Yes Navy is a D-1 classified school. Yes they lost to 1-AA power Delaware today 59-52. Big deal. Almost everyone who follows Navy closely, thought they would lose this game this weekend. What's worse? Navy losing to a highly rated 1-AA team or star-studded Michigan losing to Appalachian State (which has since lost twice this season)? Is it worse for Navy to lose to Delaware than it is for Dan Hawkins' Colorado team to lose to Montana State last year, who then turned around and lost to DII Chadron State. Hawkins seems to be doing just fine right now at Colorado. Gene Chizik was supposed to be the hottest hire in the country when he signed on with Iowa State. Guess what? He lost this year to Northern Iowa but beat later beat Iowa.

The bottom line is that there's only so much you can do with the personnel Navy has. Yes they're classified as a D-1 school. But lets be honest-they've got 1-AA offensive talent and D-2 defensive talent. Even that might be being kind. With the injuries to three of Navy's best defensive players, it has crippled an already depth-challenged, talent-deficient and inexperienced defense. Delaware was much more athletic and talented than Navy and are a team loaded with D-1 transfers. QB Joe Flacco transferred from Pitt, which ironically, lost to Navy two weeks ago at Pitt. And lets not forget the controversial onside kick which Navy recovered with 4 minutes left, only to have reversed on a horrible offsides call that replays show didn't happen.

As the old saying goes, you can't squeeze blood from a turnip. In this case, Johnson has squeezed blood from a turnip and there's simply nothing left to squeeze. If Navy losing to Delaware is so bad, then how must Pitt, Air Force, Ball State and Duke feel? After all, they all lost to Navy. And for the most part, those teams have been fairly competitive against most of their schedule. Pitt beat Cincinnati and lost to Michigan State by 4. Air Force beat Utah, TCU, Wyoming and Colorado State. Ball State took our beloved Huskers to the wire and beat Turner Gill's upstart Buffalo team by 35. They were also competitive against Illinois today.

Johnson has already proven himself over the course of the past 5 years at Navy by doing more with less than any coach in the country. He proved himself at Georgia Southern where he was the one putting the scare into D-1 schools like Georgia and Oregon State. PJ will have his team on national TV next week going up against Notre Dame. A win there would be the kind of win that could put him on the radar for other high profile schools looking for a new coach next year.

A look at Navy's rushing offense

In 2007, Paul Johnson's Navy team once again leads the NCAA in rushing yards with an average of 343 yards per game. This is on par with what Navy has done since Johnson took over the program in 2002:

2002 (2-10) 3rd nation rushing 271 YPG
2003 (8-5) 1st nation rushing 323 YPG
2004 (10-2) 3rd nation rushing 290 YPG
2005 (8-4) 1st nation rushing 318 YPG
2006 (9-4) 1st nation rushing 327 YPG

Navy has also rushed the ball extremely well against the four best teams on their schedule:

Rutgers
254 yards

Pitt
331 yards

Wake Forest
328 yards

Air Force
302 yards


The Midshipmen are more of a "run by committee" team with no player averaging more than 84 yards per game. And they're doing it with players with the talent of Nebraska's walk-ons. Imagine Zac Lee running the offense, handing off to a committee of RBs like Quentin Castille, Marlon Lucky, Roy Helu, Kenny Wilson, Collins Okafor, Marcus Mendoza etc. And running behind a line that doesn't average about 6'1 and 270 lbs like Navy's does.

There's no guarantee that Johnson would run the same style of offense he does at Navy because he is a coach that will adapt his schemes to the type of players on his roster. However, being able to run the ball at a cold weather (and windy) school like Nebraska is essential.

Thursday, October 25, 2007

News Journal discusses upcoming Navy game

This article discusses Navy and Paul Johnson as Navy prepares to play I-AA powerhouse Delaware this weekend:


Navy is hardly a typical I-A program, however. As a service academy, it only admits students who fit Navy's rigorous academic demands. It does not award scholarships, as the academy pays the tuition and room and board of all its midshipmen.

In football, Navy has succeeded at the I-A level largely by perfecting Johnson's signature offense, the triple option.

"They find a weakness on you, and they just exploit it," Delaware coach K.C. Keeler said. "He's a master of how you're trying to stop him, these are things he's now going to attack you with."

Johnson's first Navy squad in 2002 went 2-10 but trounced Army 58-12. His subsequent teams have finished 8-5, 10-2, 8-4 and 9-4, beaten Army and gone to a bowl game.

Sunday, October 21, 2007

PJ has a history with Nebraska

As in...

Georgia Southern piled up 500 yards despite having two touchdowns called back against Dennis Erickson's rising Oregon State team in a 48-41 loss in '99. Erickson reportedly immediately told his boss to never schedule that team again and word apparently got around quickly.

"We've called South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia Tech," Johnson said. "Gosh, we've called everybody. We have a hard time getting a game. Georgia has to play us every four years so we'll get them in 2004."

Johnson discovered one opponent willing to play him.

"Nebraska, they wanted to open the season with us," he said.

Why didn't that work out, a reporter asked.

"What am I, crazy? We wouldn't have had enough people left to play our Southern Conference schedule," Johnson said laughing. "There's a big difference in playing at Nebraska where they just keep running out those big hosses. We'll play Georgia, Florida or whoever because it's not the same physical beating you'd take with Nebraska."

National pundits agree

Pete Fiutak of College Football News has weighed in:

Nebraska, ready to make everything all better? Want to push the back button on the DVR and try this whole thing over again? One name: Paul Johnson. He has his Navy team at 4-2 with the nation’s number one rushing offense. He’s taken a program that’s unable to get any appreciable D-I talent and molded it into a disciplined mini-juggernaut that’s gone to four straight bowl games with a 39-17 since 2002. Again, he's doing this with a different level of athlete. Nebraska, I’m begging you. Pull down your drawers and flash a big, fat vertical smile to the spread offense, realize that you actually had it right all along, and go back to running the option. Don’t be afraid of the wishbone. Go back to what you do best, and you’ll scare the bejeebers out of the rest of the Big 12.

And www.coacheshotseat.com has PJ running #1 for the soon-to-be open NU job.

Who will be the next head football coach at Nebraska?
1. Paul Johnson - 10-1: One of the best coaches in the game and a guy that has proved that he can win at every level and can run any offense that fits the players he is presented with. He had a passing attack as an offensive coordinator at Hawaii, he won championships at Georgia Southern, and he has made Navy a competitive football program, which is next to impossible with the type of players he has to recruit to Annapolis. Johnson would more than likely put in an option running attack in Lincoln, and he would reestablish the Nebraska identity as a smash-mouth football program. Johnson is one of the coaches that the other Big 12 coaches would hate to see in Lincoln.

2. Jim Grobe - 15-1: Probably should have been hired the last time Nebraska was looking for a head coach, and in the interim 4 years he has proved his worth and ability even more. What he has done at Wake Forest is next to incredible, and like Johnson this guy can coach the game of football. He is a good recruiter and his personality fits the Nebraska people to a tee. Understated, modest, but will also field a team that will take no quarter from anyone. Grobe is another one of those coaches that other coaches in the Big 12 would not like to see in Lincoln.

3. Bo Pelini - 20-1: A former Nebraska assistant that has proved he knows how to coach defense at the highest level of the game. The thing with Pelini is if he can be an effective head coach, and there is only one way to find that out, and the question is if Nebraska would be willing to take a chance on a guy that has never sat in Hot Seat. Pelini understands well the expectations at a place like Nebraska, and he would embrace the Husker fan base which would be a big change from the current coaching staff. Can Nebraska afford to take a chance on Pelini? Tom Osborne was an assistant on the Husker staff when he was the made head coach at Nebraska. Enough said.

4. Bronco Mendenhall - 40-1: One of the bright young lights in the coaching business, his personality would fit in well on the plains of Nebraska. Mendenhall has done a good job of turning the BYU program around, and he will certainly be someone that will be considered for big-time jobs in the near future. Bronco would embrace the opportunity coach at a place like Nebraska, and no doubt he would put a winning team on the field week in and week out. This would be an outside of the box hire, but a guy that would win big in Lincoln.

5. Joe Glenn - 50-1: One of the top coaches in the game, Glenn has gotten caught up in the difficulty of coaching at a place like Wyoming. Glenn won one I-AA National Championship at Montana and was a runner-up in another. His approach to the game mirrors Coach Osborne's in many ways, and he was born in Lincoln, Nebraska. If Glenn had taken another job instead of Wyoming, at a place where the opportunity to win games is greater, he would be on the top of Nebraska wish list right now. Glenn would fit well at Nebraska, and he would win big.

6. Turner Gill - 75-1: A legendary QB for the Cornhuskers, Turner Gill understands the Nebraska football program inside out, and no doubt he will get an interview from Tom Osborne. Coach Gill seems to have the Buffalo program turning around, and if he can keep that program moving up, he will be up for a number of jobs in the coming years. Hiring Gill would be a big chance for Nebraska, because there would be tremendous pressure on him to restore the program pretty quickly, and the people making this decision need to decide if this is a position for a guy that has never been a head coach at his level before. Gill would be an innovative and trail-blazing hire by Nebraska, and he will certainly be a serious candidate for the job.



The real problem for Nebraska is that there is not an obvious perfect hire for the Cornhuskers. The decision on the new coach must be driven by the idea that hiring someone that fits in well in Nebraska is the most important thing, once basic coaching competency is established. Bill Callahan was just a terrible hire for the Cornhuskers, and we have no doubt that Coach Osborne will be looking to bring someone to Lincoln that has all of the following characteristics:



1. Integrity beyond reproach

2. Understands the demands of coaching at place like Nebraska

3. Wants to stay at Nebraska for a long time and make this his last job

4. Is committed to reestablishing Nebraska's football identity as a hard-working, over-achieving, championship goal-setting, and winning football program

5. Fits in with the fans of the Nebraska football program.


Since a few of us here at Coaches Hot Seat have had the opportunity to spend some time in Lincoln and Omaha, Nebraska over the years, we would like to say a few things about the Nebraska fans and people of that state. They are the truest of the true, the steadiest you will ever find, and when you get right down to it, the people of Nebraska are some of the best you will meet anywhere. It says a lot about just what kind of men Pederson and Callahan really are, to have the Cornhusker fans turn against them so vehemently. The Nebraska job is a terrific opportunity for some coach out there, and for that coach that is lucky enough to get that job, if he embraces all that Nebraska is he will come to realize he has got one of the best jobs in the land.